"We do nothing on complex objects (notably clearly violating groups & pages)"

Antigone Davis: "Hey did you ask for more child safety specific HC? If you have 5 minutes for a call, I can provide some context for the question." Christopher ████: "would you benefit from specific examples of where we fall short? eg: - we do nothing on complex objects (notably clearly violating groups & pages) - we can't detect 'new' CEICEIChild Exploitative ImageryMeta's policy and enforcement category for imagery that sexually exploits children, tracked separately from Minor Sexualization and from Inappropriate Interactions with Children. The source document has executives weighing whether to limit the CEI figure published in the Community Standards Enforcement Report to Facebook only, "to avoid a step-change some time in the future when we lose access to private messaging", at a point when by their own estimate "almost 90%" of egregious CEI content was on Messenger.Full entry ↗ - we're scrabbling to be ready for encryption - our IICIICInappropriate Interactions with ChildrenA classifier threshold and content category for interactions between adults and children indicative of grooming or exploitation, referred to internally as "a.k.a. 'grooming'". The source document puts the scale at "~500k victims per DAY in English markets only", three times Messenger's prevalence, while calling it "a preliminary metric" and adding "we expect the true situation is worse".Full entry ↗ numbers (notably on IG) are through the roof - we don't have comprehensive logging or measurement, we need both - anything beyond *sexual* abuse is effectively being ignored - we don't have bandwidth to properly support new products (i worry about Reels & RTC in particular) - we have big surface gaps, reporting gaps, detection gaps, and review capacity gaps"