Adjustments to privacy by default by teens are about looking good to regulators

████: "#wut PBD" ████: "Private by default :)"| ████: "Ok got it… Sorry for being a dumb n00b, but boosting is what, having new teens content ranked higher so they get more engagement or am I way off?" ████ it was about boosting teens appearances in Suggested Users. WHich is something growth is testing now for US Android in general" ████: "I'm still kinda confused about the goal. We want to make sure teens don't accidentally share more than they want, and avoid creepers, but then some of them totally want that and then if we boost them, we are inviting people to see more teens in their suggestions. Is it about decoupling clear privacy control from integrity issues, or is it about saying we want to reduce integrity problems, but not wanting the consequence of less interactions and follows?" ████: "It is about looking good to regulators so that they don't block our under 13 year old IG version we are working on. Thats it. It has a terrible impact on teen engagement and retention and no detectable benefit on integrity metrics."