Chat: if we want product leadership to prioritize wellbeing product changes we have to come up with a killer statistic

Internal document38 messagesParticipants redacted or unnamed

Source PDF not yet released. Text is transcribed from the public filing.

Thread View

A readable view of the chat, built from the transcribed text. Each row is one timestamped message in the record. Times are Pacific, as recorded. Check the Source PDF for the original layout.

████ name redacted. Different bars may be the same person or different people.

quoted in an excerpt in the archive.

Friday 25 September 2020

09:23████Reminder that Nino will be presenting today at 1pm in the CDS Tech talk, about 2021 opportunities
09:25████yes, please join!
09:54████for the people in the south bay/peninsula, I just took the flu shot in Crossover in Santa Clara. There's another one in mountain view (shoreline/101). It was pretty fast and easy, I didn't have to get out of the car or touch anything and was done in 3-4 minutes. You can see the exact locations and make an appointment in the links in this wiki: https://www.internalfb.com/intern/people/portal/benefits/health-and-wellness/flu-shots
14:08████My takeaway was that if we want product leadership to prioritize wellbeing product changes we have to come up with a killer statistic. (That seems both simple and hard.)
14:09████and for some problems, probably impossible
14:11████@Justin, I think some of our descriptive stats from the body image survey could potentially be enough to change the conversation.
14:12████was this "girl teens being 32x more likely to get unsolicited sex talk on IG compared to FB" the main example?
14:12████i think so
14:12████seems like everyone is getting all hot about problematic use again, bc of the stupid documentary. could be an opportunity.
14:19████32x, but what's the baseline rate?
14:20████I don't think they mentioned it in the talk, but there was a reference in the slides.
14:23████Yep, glad that we didn't abandon the research.
14:34████the baseline was FB
14:35████whatever they use to detect sex talk with minors on FB, on IG it was 32X. The prevalence is low, of course
14:35████(fortunately)
14:35████Or by baseline you were asking for the specific prevalence?
14:36████Also, Reels seems to be everything they denounce in the stupid documentary and everything we know from our research: passive consumption of an endless feed, without any connection to the content creator. yay
14:37████Exactly. Ugh.
14:37████Passive consumption of content from people we don't care about. It's like the anti-Moira
14:39████I think this was the number of teens who had a DM/Messenger thread with a "sketchy" adult. So on IG there were 32x as many of these threads in the US than on FB. (Don't know how they defined sketchy.)
14:40████I think it's sex-talk between adult and minor, from a prior conversation I had with Nino
14:41████(with all the caveats about the quality of our detection of these things)
14:41████Oh! Glad you clarified.
14:41████IDK if it is restricted to non-followers
14:45████Yeah. So like 32x could still be small and/or the CIs could also be large.
14:46████Yes. I had some convesations with the child safety team when I was working on age affinity. It's low prevalence, but extremely high intensity/risk/damaging
14:47████The investigator I talked to at FB was the saddest person I've ever met. Seriously, it was heart breaking.
14:47████Not that it's not important, but I guess my point is that there's a lot of leeway in how stats are presented to achieve some goal.
14:48████#fakedataforgood?
14:48████(I kid, I kid)
14:48████more than #fake it's like #lyingwithstatistics
14:49████I think the point was that there was an effort at FB, not a lot of attention at IG and when they looked they realized it was much worse on this side of the fence
14:57████Q: Is loneliness decreasing over time? A1: Yes it is, and the difference is statistically significant. A2: No, it's not changing. The trend is basically flat.
15:07████████ potential example of #lyingwithstatistics or...?
15:08████A difference of opinion? Haha
15:11████Yeah - it's tough. A1 is stats, A2 is interpretation of those stats/effect sizes as actually meaningful/important or not (which can go either way, and easily influenced by what we want to find/conclude).
15:26████These discussions made me think about Joseph Adler's old note about cheating with deltoid: https://fb.workplace.com/notes/experimentalists/how-to-lie-with-deltoid/281428872493535/
15:50████That is the most amazing note I've read this year.