Chat: only being shared in private and select groups, to avoid leaks

Raw text

Transcribed text as recorded, including headers and formatting fragments.

Exhibit 65 Message From [/O=THEFACEBOOK/OU=EXTERNAL (FYDIBOHFZSSPDLT)/CN=REC|PIENTS/CN=FBSGS865897240189080189FD4191063] Sent 9/30/2021 5:43:58 ABA To -l Patrick Lam [ _- [- [ Subject: Message summary [{"otherUserFbld":null,"threadeId":2893629427424698}] Antachnnents: sfickenpng;243076976_381964536924012_3660718374865711815_nJpg;243503063_192571679655151_9086483827251844898_nJpg (9/29/2021 11:09: 26 PDT): > e resu s o , e arge end-of-haTf TRIPSlike survey are on1y being shared in private and select groups, to avoid leaks. Sad new world (9/29/2021 11:09:58 PDT): >can you ge us in those groups? 0 '3 (9/29/2021 11:10:07 pm): p 5 mt", a eas and i? 2-, 'v . _ (2/29/2021 11:10:22 222:) > c. 2 'I >yes 9: ! 37.3.; N a... z:- C1302. (9/29/2021 11:10:28 PDT): .0222 \D 23 '1' shared: sticker.png I s 3 1'31 :3 ' ' (9/29/2021 14:58:41 PDT): 13 :- > ey are in his 66person secret group. eing s are and are in it, other Tet me know if you're interested?7 It'sofie "TG Bad Experiences measurement working group" https://fb.w0rkp ace.com groups/320844905850788 in ti; ;:... .3 (9/29/2021 15:02:44 PDT): s ou e in erested in seeing too! (9/29/2021 15:28:23 PDT): > an 5 us 'In. :11] take a 'Iookthis evening (9/29/2021 17:10:34 PDT): v )> m 0 , research decks with annotations just released pub1ic1y half an hour ago: https://about.fb.com/news/2021/09/research-teen- two L111 we'I'I-being-and-instagram/ An I you read the (9/29/2021 17:43:15 PDT): annotations, they are the worst. whether or not the research was flawed. this makes me so upset. (9/29/2021 17:57:55 PDT): > 00 a qUTC pass re: xMVP 'Igtm! - >you re in e group, | (9/29/2021 17:58:18 PDT): (9/29/2021 19:27:15 PDT): V 0 o 5. now wsg is reTeasing the fu1'l text of notes (with names redacted). i've downToaded everything to share with you. (9/29/2021 19:27:46 PDT): shared: http://www.facebook.com/1093663714769941 as Facebook.s_Documents_About_Instagram_and_Teens_PubIished_-_WSJ.pdf CONFIDENTIAL PROTECTED BY CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT - MT-lG-AG-OO144350 (9/29/2021 19:27:47 PDT): shared: http://www.facebook.com/611050453388550 as mentalhealth-findings.pdf (9/29/2021 19:27:51 PDT): shared: http://www.facebook.com/1156043448138165 as teens-young-adults-on-ig-and-facebook.pdf (9/29/2021 19:27:51 PDT): shared: http://www.facebook.com/1023438478415832 as social-comparison-topics-celebrities-like-counts-selfies.pdf (9/29/2021 19:27:52 PDT): shared: http://www.facebook.com/3038149803174046 as teen-girls-body-image-and-social-comparison-oninstagram.pdf (9/29/2021 19:27:59 PDT): shared: http://www.facebook.com/698441011549595 as teen-mentalhealth-deep-dive.pdf (9/29/2021 19:28:03 PDT): shared: http://www.facebook.com/4427380617300420 as appearance-basedsocial-comparisonon-instagram.pdf (9/29/2021 19:28:45 PDT): > omg. no sure w at happened. there should be 6 files. the article plus 5 notes. here's a zip (9/29/2021 19:29:13 PDT): shared: http://www.facebook.com/4180386002088307 as Archive.zip (9/29/2021 19:44:30 For): >1Sl ent ve sai it before, and i'll it again. the research is really great, and something to be read of. i think it's better to have it all out there than just the parts WSJsaydecides 1 are newsworthy. also. so even if you accept that "Face ook knew!!!" the first appearance pari so note i see was posted in February. how quickly are we supposed to fix the problem? or are we just supposed to shut down the whole pro d uct? . (9/29/2021 20:42:03 PDT): > Sl en recognize some of Justin and Moira's (et al) notes. others are from ux, right? or is it all us? It's a bit shocking to see it published like that (9/29/2021 20: 50:32 PDT) 'ltt narrative seems to be that either Instagram should just shut down, or that there's some magic wand you could use to eliminate negative social comparison. It's just a distraction. but I feel for the people involved (although I think Justin and Moira are taking it pretty chill) (9/29/2021 20:54:42 PDT): >-51 ent Ha a I'm actually not quite chill given what's transpired today. (9/29/2021 20:56:08 PDT): >_si ent orry to ear t a . By "what's transpired today" you mean all the extra publication of the original notes? Or something else I missed? (9/29/2021 20:59:11 PDT): >,sw en ea - that and also the release of the annotated decks. (9/29/2021 21:31:49 PDT): CONFIDENTIAL PROTECTED BY CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT - MT-lG-AG-00144351 >@silent shiza I'm sorry - anything we can do to help support? > >Also just saw a comms update that there's an upcoming 60 minutes that may cover some of this as well? But maybe research, algorithms, and election integrity stuff more generally? (9/29/2021 21:56:54 PDT): >We have an ISci well being meeting tomorrow, we can use it for venting and support (9/29/2021 22:42:53 PDT): >@silent shared: 243076976_381964536924012_3660718374865711815_n.jpg (9/29/2021 22:43:58 PDT): >@silent sure does, Sure does. shared: 243503063_192571679655151_9086483827251844898_n.jpg CONFIDENTIAL - PROTECTED BY CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT MT-IG-AG-00144352