Chat: we do nothing on complex objects (notably clearly violating groups & pages)
Raw text
Message From: Sent: To: Subject: Antigone Davis [/O=THEFACEBOOK/OU=EXTERNAL (FYDIBOHF25SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN 10/1/2020 5:27:23 PM Antigone Davis [ @fb.com]; Chris (CI) @fb.com] Message summary [{"otherUserFbId":100028413038289, "threadFbId":null}] Antigone Deborah Davis (10/01/2020 07:13:18 PDT): >Hey did you ask for more child safety specific HC? If you have 5 minutes for a call, I can provide some context for the question. Christopher (10/01/2020 07:22:13 PDT): >yep i can drop out now Christopher (10/01/2020 07:22:45 PDT): >will call you Christopher (10/01/2020 07:23:24 PDT): >free for the next 7 mins Antigone Deborah Davis (10/01/2020 09:24:43 PDT): >Here is the draft deck I have put together for Nick. would love your feedback. This is really a first conversation on his part. Antigone Deborah Davis (10/01/2020 09:24:53 PDT): >https://drive.google.com/file/d/17GNUEUgjEaIUUjclrRTuiqDgFa-b1U8s/view?usp=sharing Christopher (10/01/2020 09:53:36 PDT): >would you benefit from specific examples of where we fall short? > >eg: >- we do nothing on complex objects (notably clearly violating groups & pages) >- we can't detect 'new' CEI >- we're scrabbling to be ready for encryption >- our IIC numbers (notably on IG) are through the roof >- we don't have comprehensive logging or measurement, we need both >- anything beyond *sexual abuse is effectively being ignored >- we don't have bandwidth to properly support new products (i worry about Reels & RTC in particular) >- we have big surface gaps, reporting gaps, detection gaps, and review capacity gaps Christopher (10/01/2020 09:54:09 PDT): >(that's not me complaining, just some top-of-mind worries) Christopher (10/01/2020 09:55:49 PDT): >the slide on headcount vs health & privacy is really strong Antigone Deborah Davis (10/01/2020 09:56:26 PDT): >Sure, some of this in the original quip doc we put together https://fb.quip.com/QRndAZrYZuwc, would be great for you to add your two cents there. Or I can just pull from the work chat and add it and save you the time. Antigone Deborah Davis (10/01/2020 09:56:45 PDT): >It is quite astonishing. Antigone Deborah Davis (10/01/2020 09:58:02 PDT): >Heard the CEI solicitation classifier made it through LAMA. Antigone Deborah Davis (10/01/2020 09:58:07 PDT): >Wahoo! Christopher (10/01/2020 10:00:14 PDT): >we got 2 things through: > >1) blocklist for 'obvious' terms (like 'kid porn' etc) >2) classifier for auto-enforcing at high precision on a wider pool of terms (most will still be fairly 'obvious') Christopher (10/01/2020 10:00:39 PDT): >(it's actually a different classifier to the CEIS one a specific keyword classifier Antigone Deborah Davis (10/01/2020 10:27:23 PDT): >Ahhh HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL (COMPETITOR) HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL (ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY) PLTF EX PLTF EX-00611 ΜΕΤΑ3047MDL-014-00206916 METANMAG-002-00437401 PLTF EX-00611_0001 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL (COMPETITOR) HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL (ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY) META3047MDL-014-00206917 METANMAG-002-00437402 PLTF EX-00611_0002