Published excerpts and testimony that name this person.
Names come from recorded metadata. Being named does not mean a person wrote or said every passage. Only differences in capitalisation and spacing are combined; initials, titles and nicknames stay separate.
Asks whether Mosseri supports a legal right — and specifically a legal mandate — for minors to have their online data expunged.
Mosseri confirms account/data deletion is already available and says he'd support legislation mandating that companies allow it.
Citing Meta's own letter (15,000 human reviewers) and Frances Haugen's view that human review outperforms AI at catching eating-disorder content, asks whether Mosseri will commit to investing more in human review specifically. …
Presses on how much of Instagram's review staff actually covers each of the 70 languages the platform serves, and whether that leaves moderation gaps. …
Asks what concrete steps are being taken today on age verification for under-13s, and why parental controls took this long given Meta's prior experience with Messenger Kids. …
Asks whether Meta's 21 million CSAM-report submissions to NCMEC in 2020 also flag the individual traffickers/exploiters posting that content, not just the images. …
Rejects Mosseri's platform-wide "5 in 10,000" prevalence stat as not matching what actually happened on the test 13-year-old account, and asks why Instagram's own recommended-account algorithm led directly to the harmful content shift. …
Cites a Tech Transparency Project (TTP) experiment finding minors could reach drug dealers on Instagram in two clicks, and asks why children's accounts can search drug content at all. …
Re-asks, more insistently, whether Mosseri agrees with the Surgeon General's recommendation to limit social media usage, after an earlier non-answer.
Mosseri again avoids agreeing/disagreeing directly, redirects to parental-controls tools in development.
Directly asks whether Instagram's revenue increases with more time spent on the platform.
Mosseri confirms directly — more time on platform means more revenue.
Frames "Instagram for Kids" itself as a potential "gateway drug" to more platform usage, and asks why it was paused, whether the pause is permanent, and whether Mosseri worries it would hook kids further. …
Asks Mosseri to explain what "engagement based ranking" means.
Mosseri describes engagement-based ranking as surfacing the content Instagram predicts a user will find most relevant/interesting, filtered for community-guideline violations.
Asks whether Instagram employs behavioral scientists and whether Mosseri would be informed if they discovered a negativity bias affecting teenage girls specifically. …
Points out that Instagram's stated age/gender/location-only ad-targeting limit applies to advertisers but not to Instagram's own ML ad-delivery system, and asks whether that's a double standard. …
Cites Instagram's own Head of Safety and Well-Being naming a specific viewing-duration threshold (~20 minutes) for negative mental-health impact, and asks how that squares with a time-on-platform-driven business model. …
Describes a specific constituent case — a 14-year-old groomed on Instagram and trafficked across state lines — whose only legal recourse against Instagram is binding arbitration, and asks whether children harmed this severely should have another avenue for redress. …
Cites the WSJ "Facebook Files" 32%/13%/6% statistics and asks whether Mosseri will finally commit to producing the underlying research to the committee. …
Asks whether Mosseri was personally concerned by the suicidal-ideation finding, whether Instagram ever quantified actual teen-girl deaths linked to the product, and what specific policy changes resulted from the research. …