Chat: This will likely smash engagement, DAP, MAP etc

Internal document29 Aug 201925 messages1 named participant, plus redacted or unnamed

A readable view of the chat, built from the transcribed text. Each row is one timestamped message in the record. Times are Pacific, as recorded. Check the Source PDF for the original layout.

████ name redacted. Different bars may be the same person or different people.

quoted in an excerpt in the archive.

Thursday 29 August 2019

13:40████12/17/2024 I just caught up with Brett W and he forgot to give us some relevant feedback in the morning review around private accounts. It seems that in the Tuesday review for well-being, Adam and Vishal both pushed on us starting to move towards creating accounts private by default.

13:41████The ask in that meeting was apparently how to go about testing the effects of that

13:43████immediately

13:45████My thought is that we could identify a few cohorts for whom we think this is useful (teens 13-18, women in emerging markets, potentially secondary accounts)

13:45████to get the ball rolling on this

14:16████ah thanks. I just got looped into a thread here from 1. I asked about default to private vs. defaulting no DM'ing from people you aren't connected to as part of private account. My POV is the latter would be more impactful for bullying. We have tested this in the past and it has been very negative for ecosystem metrics IIRC

14:16████I think we could try for Teens in the US as a first pass. we can't really do Teens outside US as we don't have age modeling esp at registration. I'm not sure we have the data at registration to be confident in teen/non-teen at registration either, tbh

14:18████i think the discussion was for when we add age to registration in October

14:19████so we'll have the specific cohort of teens 13-18 based on self-reported age

14:19████considering the data Vivek showed for India (63% of women going in and making their accounts private post-factum)

14:19████I'd say it's worth testing there too

14:20Darius Kilsteinholy shit

14:20Darius KilsteinWhat's the rationale for the push?

14:20Darius KilsteinThis will likely smash engagement, DAP, MAP etc

14:20████current climate? policy pressure? potentially contributing to teen suicides?

14:21Darius Kilsteinwhat policy pressure?

14:21████What are we doing to protect minors

14:21Darius Kilsteini see

14:21Darius Kilsteinso is this just for minors?

14:21Darius Kilsteinor for everyone?

14:21████This is why Karina is pushing us to bundle some defaults with age

14:22Darius KilsteinI see

14:25████i think it's worth chatting in person. Meet at 3 for 15min chat? I put it on the calendar

14:26Darius Kilsteinsounds good :)

14:28████Shared an image

Chat: This will likely smash engagement, DAP, MAP etc

Thread View