Chat: I would have thought that he would be more an advocate of harm prevention

Internal document10 messages2 participants

Source PDF not yet released. Text is transcribed from the public filing.

Raw text

Transcribed text as recorded, including headers and formatting fragments.

Message From: Jonathan ████ [/O=THEFACEBOOK/OU=EXTERNAL (FYDIBOHF25SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=████ Sent: 9/12/2018 1:03:28 AM To: Jonathan ████ [@fb.com]; Guy Rosen [@fb.com] Subject: Message summary [{"otherUserFbid":100022038991455,"threadFbid":null}] Attachments: 41501601_1137084429778870_282596040484323328_n.png Guy Rosen (9/11/2018 14:43:41 PDT): >btw I prewired Mark a little about encryption / scanning Guy Rosen (9/11/2018 14:43:52 PDT): >his initial reaction was "in the end it'll all be encrypted" Guy Rosen (9/11/2018 14:44:01 PDT): >But I explained the net harm concept etc Guy Rosen (9/11/2018 14:44:21 PDT): >He needs to think about it - mostly he'll have context for when we eventually bring it to his attention, sooner or later. Jonathan (9/11/2018 15:18:59 PDT): >Interesting Jonathan (9/11/2018 15:32:07 PDT): >I would have thought that he would be more an advocate of harm prevention -- but it sounds like we're going to have to make the case against encryption by default Jonathan (9/11/2018 16:47:58 PDT): >Here's how I'm thinking about it: https://fb.quip.com/6YAJAIJpUGMs Guy Rosen (9/11/2018 18:02:49 PDT): >I think we need to get really crisp at the "victim discovery platform" argument Guy Rosen (9/11/2018 18:03:01 PDT): >BTW I think safety orgs make the point, I'll fwd something from Antigone that says that Guy Rosen (9/11/2018 18:03:28 PDT): shared: 41501601_1137084429778870_282596040484323328_n.png HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL (COMPETITOR) HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL (ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY) META3047MDL-020-00678235 METANMAG-002-01453636 PLTF EX-00858_0001