Chat: You'd think we JUST started working on integrity

Internal document27 messages1 named participant, plus redacted or unnamed

Raw text

Transcribed text as recorded, including headers and formatting fragments.

From: Tomas Kabbabe [/O=THEFACEBOOK/OU=EXTERNAL (FYDIBOHF25SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN= Sent: To: 6/9/2023 8:59:18 PM Tomas Kabbabe [ @meta.com]; Melissa Subject: Message summary [{"otherUserFbId":100021609290728,"threadFbId":null}] Melissa (6/09/2023 11:22:31 PDT): @meta.com] Kabbabe Exhibit 12 2/4/26 Jenn Dunn RMR CRR >so disappointing but none of it is surprising Melissa (6/09/2023 11:22:44 PDT): >I'm not surprised we have bad hashtags. our search safety team is a few employees who look at a list of popular hashtags every week to decide which to filter out: (it's super low tech Melissa (6/09/2023 11:22:49 PDT): >we also do very little to make sure handles are appropriate which is so creepy and problematic Melissa (6/09/2023 11:23:01 PDT): >Damn, Stamos finally figured out the most effective path to influencing Zuck Melissa (6/09/2023 11:23:06 PDT): >it's a really well written article, really frames and contextualizes the issue quite well Melissa (6/09/2023 11:23:24 PDT): >The fact that we recommended the pedo account that activist viewed once to all her followers is really disappointing Melissa (6/09/2023 11:23:29 PDT): >Content moderators not enforcing the rules is such a big problem. Could be the biggest problem on right now Melissa (6/09/2023 11:23:37 PDT): >It's a really big problem that you view one media and then we start recommending many like it. We gotta solve the rabbit hole issue Melissa (6/09/2023 11:24:06 PDT): >I feel like this should be mandatory reading for all of Relevance on how recommendation systems can go. It's really fair and well written by people who clearly understand the issues well Tomas Kabbabe (6/09/2023 11:25:22 PDT): >dang Tomas Kabbabe (6/09/2023 11:25:45 PDT): >I was not aware that this was an issue Tomas Kabbabe (6/09/2023 11:26:08 PDT): >this = the WSJ article? Melissa (6/09/2023 11:26:31 PDT): >yes Tomas Kabbabe (6/09/2023 11:27:44 PDT): >can you tell me more about this? Melissa (6/09/2023 11:28:29 PDT): >we think rater recall could be as low as 50%, and the non-rec labelers only know English... they label 0 media/week as hate speech, bullying, or suicide and self injury even though we know the prevalence is higher. and they frequently get easier topics wrong that don't require language comprehension, like disturbing content https://fb.workplace.com/notes/812741413296770 Melissa (6/09/2023 11:29:41 PDT): >this is a more recent check on rater recall that paints a rosier picture, but with the methodology Tomas Kabbabe (6/09/2023 11:34:50 PDT): >man Tomas Kabbabe (6/09/2023 11:35:24 PDT): >You'd think we JUST started working on integrity with issues like this one Tomas Kabbabe (6/09/2023 11:35:41 PDT): >Clearly this is hard, I don't want to dismiss the good work from the integrity teams strongly disagrees CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL PLTF EX PLTF EX-04337 ΜΕΤΑ3047MDL-047-00913209 METANMAG-005-01598833 PLTF EX-04337_0001 exhibitsticker.com Tomas Kabbabe (6/09/2023 11:35:55 PDT): >But it feels like we're so behind where we should be Melissa (6/09/2023 13:49:31 PDT): >I mean you see the chaos of the way products are shipped at Meta Melissa (6/09/2023 13:49:49 PDT): >we don't do comprehensive, holistic overviews often enough Melissa (6/09/2023 13:50:12 PDT): >we don't hold enough people responsible for metric monitoring. we only staff teams when we want to build, not maintain Melissa (6/09/2023 13:51:34 PDT): >the central integrity org is pivoting to focus on "voice" aka false positives and overenforcement. their other big new focus is "integrity value": trying to justify how integrity work adds value to the business. as a result, they've stopped investing in SWOP, which is our Meta metric for content violations! Melissa (6/09/2023 13:52:26 PDT): >integrity is an adversarial space. there's millions of people who will profit from finding ways to exploit it, so they're always trying. product teams change the way things work all the time and don't move in lockstep with integrity Melissa (6/09/2023 13:53:25 PDT): >and there's just SO MANY TYPES OF HARM. it's hard to think of all of them for everything always. just because there's no harm on an issue type or surface today doesn't mean there won't be harm on hashtags tomorrow, so someone makes the call that it's not a priority and then boom, things evolve Melissa (6/09/2023 13:59:18 PDT): >and non-rec is owned and operated by the small team on RI, so we don't benefit from Meta's best practices on making sure raters actually label the violating content as violating CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL META3047MDL-047-00913210 METANMAG-005-01598834 PLTF EX-04337 0002