Chat: it is concerning that our systems almost classify [CSAM] as an interest category, and will serve a ton of it if we think a user likes it.

Internal document17 messages2 participants

Narratives:Knowledge

Thread View

A readable view of the chat, built from the transcribed text. Each row is one timestamped message in the record. Times are Pacific, as recorded. Check the Source PDF for the original layout.

quoted in an excerpt in the archive.

Tuesday 28 November 2023

10:57PraveenShared a file
11:01Tomas Kabbabeoh damn even in pdf form
11:01Tomas Kabbabethanks Praveen!
11:06Praveenhaha np!
11:42Tomas Kabbabethis is such a hard problem
11:42Tomas KabbabeIt is true that the article seems like an intentional hit piece
11:43Tomas KabbabeBut at the same time, some of the content shouldn't be in the platform
11:43Tomas KabbabeIt's hard to know if there's always a revolving door of inappropriate content that gets produced and take down shortly after, or if we are not removing it
11:44Tomas KabbabeMy guess is that it's the former, but it's hard to know.
11:44Tomas KabbabeAll of this of course gets even more complicated by the fact that our competitors are even more lax than we are
11:44Tomas KabbabeAnd then eat our pie when we get too restrtictive
12:00Praveendefinitely agree - my guess is that it would look much much worse if we weren't doing enforcement. but it is concerning that our systems almost classify this type of contest as an interest category, and will serve a ton of it if we think a user likes it. can lead to pretty bad rabbit holes
12:00Praveenthe competitong is tough, don't have a good answer for that..
12:13Praveeni suppose it just reflects the reality that it is an interest category lol
12:19Tomas KabbabeHaha true. But one we shouldn't allow
12:20Tomas KabbabeHonestly the hardest part of my job sometimes is realizing that humans can be very gross
12:33Praveen100% EYES ONLY) PLTF EX exhibitsticke.com